AdobeStock_388111248.jpg

Practice Areas

Kansas City Product Liability Attorneys

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) developed the drug Zofran to treat acute and intense nausea. In 1991, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Zofran solely to combat nausea and vomiting related to chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery patients. The FDA approved Zofran’s generic counterpart, ondansetron, in 2006.

Even though the drug was only indicated for use in specific and severe cases related to cancer treatment and surgery, GSK began marketing Zofran “off-label” (not FDA approved) for pregnancy-related nausea, also known as morning sickness. By 2006, Zofran became the most commonly prescribed antiemetic (a drug prescribed to treat vomiting and nausea) in pregnant women.

If you took Zofran while pregnant and your child was born with a disability or defect, call a Kansas City Zofran injury attorney at (816) 861-7600. We can help you explore your legal options.

Zofran Studies & Trials

GSK did not engage in any studies or medical trials to research the effects that Zofran might have on a fetus before marketing it to pregnant women. In 1991, when the FDA first approved Zofran, the only data that GSK submitted regarding the effect of Zofran on babies in utero were two animal experiments done in 1984 and 1985.

These studies were done on rats and rabbits that have gestation periods of approximately one month or less. In these studies, Zofran was not administered until after the first third of gestation was nearly over. Therefore, these experiments could not give any indication of the drug’s effect in early fetal development. The experiments did, however, indicate toxicity, incomplete bone growth, and intrauterine fetal death.

A later study conducted in humans confirmed that ingested Zofran crossed the human placenta barrier and exposed fetuses to substantial concentrations. A 2004 study on ondansetron and fetal development found that the drug did not considerably increase risk for major malformations. It did not examine lesser malformations, lesser risk, or any specific malformation. This study also had a sample size of only 174 pregnancies. For perspective, another antiemetic prescribed to pregnant women is Doxylamine–Pyridoxine (also marketed as Bendectin, Diclegis, and Duchesnay). The fetal safety data for that drug is based on more than 250,000 pregnancies.

Two Key Studies Link Zofran to Birth Defects

  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found in a 2011 study with a sample size of over 4,500 cases that ondansetron taken in the first trimester doubled the risk of cleft palate incidence.
  • A 2014 study revealed that babies exposed to Zofran in utero experienced a 30% increase in major malformations due to an increase in heart problems.

FDA Categorizations for Pregnancy Risks

The FDA categorizes drugs based on their risk in pregnancy. The classifications are A-D, which indicate varying degrees of risk, X, which is contraindicated in pregnancy, and N, which is not yet classified. Currently, ondansetron (Zofran) has a B classification, meaning that either animal studies have shown no adverse effect but there are no adequate studies in pregnant women, or animal studies showed an adverse effect on the fetus but human trials have not shown a risk. This classification is due, in part, to the fact that GSK only submitted animal studies to the FDA and no human trials.

GSK did not seek or receive FDA approval to market Zofran to pregnant women. Consequently, the use of Zofran by pregnant women – a drug they believed to be safe – has caused devastating results:

  • Cleft palate
  • Jaundice
  • Major kidney defects
  • Heart defects
  • Musculoskeletal abnormalities
  • Decreased birth weight
  • Hearing loss
  • Vision problems
  • Abnormal blood pressure

These birth defects may require extensive surgeries and a lifetime of therapies and treatment.

GSK Pleads Guilty to Off-Label Promotion of Zofran

In 2012, GSK pled guilty to the off-label promotion of its drugs, including Zofran. GSK’s irresponsible and illegal conduct has irreparably damaged families all over the world. Cullan & Cullan specializes in cases like these and can help you with your lawsuit if your baby was born with a birth defect due to Zofran. Our Kansas City Zofran lawyers can advise you of your options and can help you take the right steps to seek justice.

Please contact us today at (816) 861-7600 to discuss your case.

News, Insights & Cases

Spotlight

radiologists.hero_.jpg
Case Study

$12 Million Verdict: MRI Misdiagnosis

courtroom_gavel_hero.jpg
News

Federal Jury Slams Radiology Group with Unanimous $12 Million Verdict After Missed MRI Lesion Leads to Two-Year Cancer Misdiagnosis

AdobeStock_707233203.jpg
Insight

Vaginal Birth vs C-Section: What to Know

iStock-642036060.jpg
Insight

The Role of Lawyers in Birth Trauma Cases

iStock-874118932.jpg
Insight

Understanding Shoulder Dystocia Legal Rights

fetal-monitoring.jpg
Insight

The Link Between Premature Birth and Cerebral Palsy

cesarean-section.jpg
Insight

C-Section vs Vaginal Birth: Key Differences

iStock-1311182384.jpg
Insight

How to Choose a Birth Trauma Lawyer

Woman in labor
Insight

How to Choose a Shoulder Dystocia Attorney

Newborn baby
Insight

Understanding Cerebral Palsy in Premature Infants

Success Stories

Families We've Helped

nerve-injury.jpgPlay video

"My child had permanent paralysis in her left arm and no one gave us a straight answer on how bad it actually was. We needed lawyers who understood the medical side of this case and hiring the Cullan brothers gave us the attention we needed."

eatep-testimonial.jpgPlay video

"His team is phenomenal, and we are forever grateful for everything they have done for us."

durham.jpgPlay video

"After suffering a spinal cord injury during a rollover accident, our client Tony Durham was left paralyzed for the rest of his life."

spinal.jpgPlay video

"Joe and Pat came to meet me helped me fight my case. I was who they cared about and I felt so important with the Cullan brothers."

Cameron DykesPlay video

"I believe Doctor Sam's experience definitely helped with the case."

skull.jpgPlay video

"During delivery, improperly used forceps caused severe head trauma to the head of our client's child. We worked diligently to secure the compensation our client deserved and to hold the negligent healthcare provider accountable to harm they caused."

birth-injury.jpgPlay video

"We knew these would be lifelong issues for our son. You have to advocate for your kids because no one else will do it. Cullan & Cullan knew what was going on and we knew they would be successful in helping us."

mackey-testimonial.jpgPlay video

"For anybody who's been in an accident and suffered a catastrophic injury, Dr. Sam is the best person you could possibly call to help. Not only is he someone who is knowledgeable and very friendly, he's also a humble person - someone who will hold your hand and guide you through the process as he did with me."