Talcum Powder Attorneys
in Kansas City, MO

Increased Ovarian Cancer Risk Linked to Talcum Powder

Shock, anger, a desire to protect the public motivated jurors to award $72 million in February of 2015 and $55 million in May of 2016 to families of women who had died from ovarian cancer after using Johnson and Johnson products.

Research suggests that for decades Johnson & Johnson knew or should have known about a link between the use of talcum powder and ovarian cancer, but did nothing to neither warn users of the risk nor effectively change the product to make it safe for women.

There are currently about 1,200 talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits pending, and additional victims are still coming forward. Evidence indicates that these powders when used for feminine hygiene, caused at least 2200 new cases of ovarian cancer each year.

What is also extremely disturbing is that internal documents show the manufacturer targeted African-American women for their cancer-causing product. The lawsuits are aimed at manufacturer Johnson & Johnson. The most notable Johnson and Johnson products are J&J’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower.

For more information, contact the Kansas City injury attorneys at (816) 253-8606. We can offer insight regarding talcum powder lawsuits and your rights.

Lawsuits Allege J&J Knew of Talc’s Ovarian Cancer Risk

According to talcum powder lawsuits, many women and their families believe their long-term talcum powder use played a role in causing them to develop ovarian cancer. There have been several studies that have found an increased risk of ovarian cancer among women who apply talc-containing powder to their genital area. Some experts have concluded that talc applied to a woman’s genital area may enter the vagina and uterus and migrate to the Fallopian tubes and ovaries, causing cancer.

The lawsuits also allege that Johnson & Johnson was aware of research that indicated using this powder on the genital area could increase risk of ovarian cancer, but did not warn users. Internal company documents show that company executives were aware of these studies as far back as the 1970s.

The Talcum Powder & Ovarian Cancer Association: A Timeline

Below is a timeline of Johnson & Johnson’s talc products, medical research about its potential to cause adverse health events like cancer, and court rulings on related lawsuits:

In 1892, upon hearing complaints of itching associated with its medical plasters, Dr. Fred Kilmer, Scientific Director of J&J, sends patients Italian talc to treat the itch. This led to the introduction of Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder in 1893. It went to market in 1894. - J&J Kilmer House

An evaluation of 22 talcum products for fibrous material found the products contained 8 to 30% fiber content, with an average of 19%. - Cralley et al., American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 1968

Examination of tissue taken from patients with ovarian and cervical tumors found talc particles deeply embedded in the tumors. - Henderson et al., BCOJ, 1971

Another evaluation of consumer talcum powder products for fibrous materials found that many contained mixtures of various minerals. The researchers wrote that the health effects of the products were unknown, warranting further study. - Rohl et al., Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1976

A Harvard case-control study found that use of talcum powder on the genital area – by dusting on the perineum or dusting sanitary napkins – increased risk of ovarian cancer by 92% compared to women who did not use talcum powder. Women who had both exposures had an increased risk of 228%. This was the first study to find a statistical correlation between talc and ovarian cancer. - Cramer et al., Cancer, 1982. Study author Dr. Daniel Cramer later stated in a court filing that Dr. Bruce Semple of Johnson & Johnson contacted him about his study. He said that Dr. Semple tried to convince him of talc’s safety, but Dr. Cramer urged warning women of the potential risk. He went on to state that he was aware of 21 other epidemiological studies published between 1983 and 2009, most of which found an association between ovarian cancer and talc. - Prepared statement by Dr. Cramer, 2011

J&J and other companies joined the Talc Interested Parties Task Force (TIPTF) to pay “scientists to perform biased research regarding the safety of talc,” according to one lawsuit. - Hogan et al. v. Johnson & Johnson et al., Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, No. 1422-CC09012

A Johns Hopkins hospital-based case-control study found that women who applied talc to sanitary napkins were at a 379% increased risk of ovarian cancer. - Rosenblatt et al., Gynecologic Oncology, 1992

Two physicians published a letter in JAMA that warns of the possible risk posed to women by talcum powder on condoms, citing research that found associations between talc and ovarian cancer. Condom manufacturers have since stopped using talc on condoms. - Kasper et al., JAMA, 1995

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified genital use of talc as possibly carcinogenic. - Baan et al., Lancet Oncology, 2006

Meta-analysis of 20 case-control studies found a 35% higher risk of ovarian cancer among those who use talcum powder products in the genital area compared to those who do not. - Langseth et al., Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2008

The Gates Study found a dose-response relationship between increasing frequency of genital talc use and ovarian cancer risk. - Gates et al., Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2008

Dr. Cramer published another study, finding a 33% increase in ovarian cancer risk among regular talc users. Use of talc on non-genital areas was not associated with an increased risk. - Cramer et al., Epidemiology, 2016

Previous Court Rulings on Talcum Powder Lawsuits

  • A St. Louis jury awarded the family of an Alabama woman $72 million in February of 2015. She passed away after a fight with ovarian cancer.
  • Another jury in St. Louis handed down a May 2016 ruling awarding the victim $55 million to cover her damages.

What if I Think I Have a Case?

If you believe that your use of Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder products caused your ovarian cancer, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit for compensation. Give Cullan & Cullan a call. We are doctors and lawyers, giving us the unique education and training to help clients who have been injured.

Our Kansas City talcum powder-ovarian cancer lawsuit attorneys are working with some of the country’s leading law firms to fight for justice on behalf of women who have ovarian cancer or on behalf of families who have lost a loved one due to ovarian cancer.

If you believe you have suffered injury due to the use of talcum powder, contact us today at (816) 253-8606 to schedule a free, no-obligation case evaluation.

Record SettingVerdicts

View All Results
  • $26.1 Million

    Medical Malpractice

    Cullan & Cullan has set a state record in Nebraska with a $26.1 million medical malpractice jury award.

  • $25.4 Million

    Medical Malpractice

    Cullan & Cullan, won a record-setting $25.4 million jury verdict for an infant injured by medical malpractice during labor and delivery.

  • $17 Million

    Birth Injury

    Negligence by nurses and hospital staff in failing to assess the position of the baby, improper use of Pitocin, and failing to obtain an assessment by physician, resulting in severe oxygen deprivation and brain injury to the baby.



  • "Simply the BEST!"

    - C. Williams

  • "People helping People"

    - James J.

  • "Do not go any further!"

    - Lanielle J.

  • "We are able to get the treatment our son needs!"

    - Eric H.

  • "I would give 100 stars on a 5-star scale if I could!"

    - Mark P.

  • "They had my best interest at heart!"

    - Deborah B.

  • "I can't thank them enough!"

    - Brandon J.

  • "They genuinely care about their clients!"

    - M.L.

  • "They helped my family through a very difficult time in our lives!"

    - S.J.

  • "I trust them with every decision!"

    - E.C.

Families We've Helped

  • "After suffering a spinal cord injury during a rollover accident, our client Tony Durham was left paralyzed for the rest of his life. Listen to his story on our website."
More Testimonials

The doctor lawyer Difference

  • A Doctor-Lawyer Oversees Every Case
  • We Limit the Number of Cases We Take On
  • Over $350 Million Recovered for Our Clients
  • You Get Direct Access To Our Lawyers
  • You Don’t Pay Unless We Win

start with your
free consultation

Fill out the form below to see how we can help.

Based on the latest government precautions, our team has moved to working remotely. If you need to get in touch, we’re still here to answer your questions via phone and email.
  • Please enter your name.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • +1
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.