Talcum Powder Attorneys
in Kansas City, MO

Increased Ovarian Cancer Risk Linked to Talcum Powder

Shock, anger, a desire to protect the public motivated jurors to award $72 million in February of 2015 and $55 million in May of 2016 to families of women who had died from ovarian cancer after using Johnson and Johnson products. Research suggests that for decades Johnson & Johnson knew or should have known about a link between the use of talcum powder and ovarian cancer, but did nothing to neither warn users of the risk nor effectively change the product to make it safe for women.

There are currently about 1,200 talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits pending, and additional victims are still coming forward. Evidence indicates that these powders when used for feminine hygiene, caused at least 2200 new cases of ovarian cancer each year. What is also extremely disturbing is that internal documents show the manufacturer targeted African-American women for their cancer-causing product. The lawsuits are aimed at manufacturer Johnson & Johnson. The most notable Johnson and Johnson products are J&J’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower.

For more information, contact the Kansas City injury attorneys at (816) 253-8606. We can offer insight regarding talcum powder lawsuits and your rights.

Lawsuits Allege J&J Knew of Talc’s Ovarian Cancer Risk

According to talcum powder lawsuits, many women and their families believe their long-term talcum powder use played a role in causing them to develop ovarian cancer. There have been several studies that have found an increased risk of ovarian cancer among women who apply talc-containing powder to their genital area. Some experts have concluded that talc applied to a woman’s genital area may enter the vagina and uterus and migrate to the Fallopian tubes and ovaries, causing cancer.

The lawsuits also allege that Johnson & Johnson was aware of research that indicated using this powder on the genital area could increase risk of ovarian cancer, but did not warn users. Internal company documents show that company executives were aware of these studies as far back as the 1970s.

The Talcum Powder & Ovarian Cancer Association: A Timeline

Below is a timeline of Johnson & Johnson’s talc products, medical research about its potential to cause adverse health events like cancer, and court rulings on related lawsuits:

1892-1894
In 1892, upon hearing complaints of itching associated with its medical plasters, Dr. Fred Kilmer, Scientific Director of J&J, sends patients Italian talc to treat the itch. This led to the introduction of Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder in 1893. It went to market in 1894. - J&J Kilmer House

1968
An evaluation of 22 talcum products for fibrous material found the products contained 8 to 30% fiber content, with an average of 19%. - Cralley et al., American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 1968

1971
Examination of tissue taken from patients with ovarian and cervical tumors found talc particles deeply embedded in the tumors. - Henderson et al., BCOJ, 1971

1976
Another evaluation of consumer talcum powder products for fibrous materials found that many contained mixtures of various minerals. The researchers wrote that the health effects of the products were unknown, warranting further study. - Rohl et al., Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1976

1982
A Harvard case-control study found that use of talcum powder on the genital area – by dusting on the perineum or dusting sanitary napkins – increased risk of ovarian cancer by 92% compared to women who did not use talcum powder. Women who had both exposures had an increased risk of 228%. This was the first study to find a statistical correlation between talc and ovarian cancer. - Cramer et al., Cancer, 1982. Study author Dr. Daniel Cramer later stated in a court filing that Dr. Bruce Semple of Johnson & Johnson contacted him about his study. He said that Dr. Semple tried to convince him of talc’s safety, but Dr. Cramer urged warning women of the potential risk. He went on to state that he was aware of 21 other epidemiological studies published between 1983 and 2009, most of which found an association between ovarian cancer and talc. - Prepared statement by Dr. Cramer, 2011

1990s
J&J and other companies joined the Talc Interested Parties Task Force (TIPTF) to pay “scientists to perform biased research regarding the safety of talc,” according to one lawsuit. - Hogan et al. v. Johnson & Johnson et al., Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, No. 1422-CC09012

1992
A Johns Hopkins hospital-based case-control study found that women who applied talc to sanitary napkins were at a 379% increased risk of ovarian cancer. - Rosenblatt et al., Gynecologic Oncology, 1992

1995
Two physicians published a letter in JAMA that warns of the possible risk posed to women by talcum powder on condoms, citing research that found associations between talc and ovarian cancer. Condom manufacturers have since stopped using talc on condoms. - Kasper et al., JAMA, 1995

2006
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified genital use of talc as possibly carcinogenic. - Baan et al., Lancet Oncology, 2006

2008
Meta-analysis of 20 case-control studies found a 35% higher risk of ovarian cancer among those who use talcum powder products in the genital area compared to those who do not. - Langseth et al., Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2008

2008
The Gates Study found a dose-response relationship between increasing frequency of genital talc use and ovarian cancer risk. - Gates et al., Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2008

2016
Dr. Cramer published another study, finding a 33% increase in ovarian cancer risk among regular talc users. Use of talc on non-genital areas was not associated with an increased risk. - Cramer et al., Epidemiology, 2016

Previous Court Rulings on Talcum Powder Lawsuits

  • A St. Louis jury awarded the family of an Alabama woman $72 million in February of 2015. She passed away after a fight with ovarian cancer.
  • Another jury in St. Louis handed down a May 2016 ruling awarding the victim $55 million to cover her damages.

What if I Think I Have a Case?

If you believe that your use of Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder products caused your ovarian cancer, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit for compensation. Give Cullan & Cullan a call. We are doctors and lawyers, giving us the unique education and training to help clients who have been injured.

Our Kansas City talcum powder-ovarian cancer lawsuit attorneys are working with some of the country’s leading law firms to fight for justice on behalf of women who have ovarian cancer or on behalf of families who have lost a loved one due to ovarian cancer.

If you believe you have suffered injury due to the use of talcum powder, contact us today at (816) 253-8606 to schedule a free, no-obligation case evaluation.

Record SettingVerdicts

View All Results
  • $19 Million

    Truck Accident

    Negligent truck driver made a right-hand turn into plaintiff’s vehicle, causing fractured vertebra and partial paralysis. Defendant alleged plaintiff was trying to pass him on the shoulder. The insurance company offered zero before trial.

  • $17 Million

    Birth Injury

    Negligence by nurses and hospital staff in failing to assess the position of the baby, improper use of Pitocin, and failing to obtain an assessment by physician, resulting in severe oxygen deprivation and brain injury to the baby.

  • $13.2 Million

    Birth Injury

    A newborn suffered brain damage due to improper administration of Pitocin, failure to monitor preeclampsia and failure to perform timely c-section.

PREV NEXT

Families We've Helped

  • "We knew these would be lifelong issues for our son. You have to advocate for your kids because no one else will do it. Cullan & Cullan knew what was going on and we knew they would be successful in helping us."
  • "If your child is damaged or you think your child is damaged, you should seek a lawyer. Having a doctor-lawyer on my side really gave me hope."
  • "My child had permanent paralysis in her left arm and no one gave us a straight answer on how bad it actually was. We needed lawyers who understood the medical side of this case and hiring the Cullan brothers gave us the attention we needed."
  • "Joe and Pat came to meet me helped me fight my case. I was who they cared about and I felt so important with the Cullan brothers."
More Testimonials

The doctor lawyer Difference

  • A Doctor-Lawyer Oversees Every Case
  • We Limit the Number of Cases We Take On
  • Over $350 Million Recovered for Our Clients
  • You Get Direct Access To Our Lawyers
  • You Don’t Pay Unless We Win

start with your
free consultation

Fill out the form below to see how we can help.
  • Please enter your name.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.